The Canadian & Haudenosaunee Constitutional Paradox

This door was made to be left Open to known friends, but by Might Makes Right and Jingoistic Maneuvers, the door was shut by threat then force of the Indian Act, the Haudenosaunee are placed [by old friends] in a legal purgatory. This information waives your right to plausible deniability. Now you have recognized the Door you have become a good Samaritan and possible friend, without looking in the Box, the Great Laws (Huadenasuanee Constitution/Wampum Law) are both continuous and broken. The paradox comes from the entanglement of the two Orders of law, the Two Row Wampum is a mechanism by which the two Orders become observed as distinctly parallel and untangled.


boxOne of the many mind-bending implications of quantum mechanics is that of the quantum superposition: the simultaneous combination of all possible states of a subatomic system. In such a superposition, a particle occupies all positions at once—it is both here and not-here, there and not-there. According to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which was ascendant in the 1920s, the superposition collapses into a definite state only at the point of observation.4 The observer and the observed are therefore intertwined, and it is the act of observation that causes the superposition to take one state or another.

Many physicists found this explanation baffling. Albert Einstein, for one, famously refused to accept it, writing that ―one cannot get around the assumption of reality—if only one is honest.

In 1935, Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger came up with a brilliant thought experiment to illustrate the odd implications of the Copenhage interpretation‘s observer-centered reality:

One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following diabolical device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small that perhaps in the course of the hour, one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges, and through a relay releases a hammer which shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed.

The first atomic decay would have poisoned it. The [psi]function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and the dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.

The purpose of the thought experiment was not to suggest that a cat can be simultaneously alive and dead, but to highlight the bizarre implications of the Copenhagen approach when applied to large-scale (i.e., cat-sized) systems. Schrödinger hoped that his example would prevent people from so naively accepting as valid a blurred model for representing reality. *

The site was created by the WITHOUTCANADA Foundation and Trust as a building tool to induce discussion on the Constitutional Paradox and Superposition, a kind of legal purgatory (likened to the Schrödinger’s Cat in a box quantum theory). This is an attempt to remedy the Canadian “geo-political” entanglement and constitutional paradox.